Different Ways of Knowing

Since 1989, researchers, reformers, and evaluators have acknowledged the effectiveness of Different Ways of Knowing’s research-based strategies and tools.


Effective School Improvement


Raising Grades and Test Scores

Multiple studies have demonstrated that Different Ways of Knowing helps raise student achievement.

  • A 1995 UCLA study found a positive correlation between students’ test scores and the number of years they participated in Different Ways of Knowing, including higher scores on written social studies tests and higher grades overall.
  • In 1997, studies by researchers at the University of Louisville and the University of Kentucky compared the performance of fourth graders in twenty-four Different Ways of Knowing schools to Kentucky students statewide on the Kentucky Instructional Results Information Systems (KIRIS). After two years of program implementation, researchers found increased gains in reading (7 percent), arts and humanities (7 percent), math (25 percent), science (7 percent), and social studies (10 percent) compared to other schools in the state.
  • A 1999 Michigan study found a positive correlation between the program’s instruction and increases in standardized reading tests results under the Michigan Educational Assessment program and the Iowa Test of Basic Skills.
  • A Texas Student Achievement Analysis of 2001–2002 comparisons of two Houston, Texas Title I middle schools with test scores lower than the district average found achievement gains in almost all subjects and grades after the school switched to Different Ways of Knowing. Gains included a 48 percent gain in eighth grade social studies, 31 percentage points in sixth grade reading, and 24 percentage points in seventh grade mathematics. Both schools closed the gap between their test scores and the district’s average.


School Results: Meeting Yearly Progress

Different Ways of Knowing schools report increased student achievement in core subject areas. These achievement gains help many schools meet their annual state performance accountability targets.


No Child Left Behind       |         Contact Us       |       What Our Clients Say       |       Search       |       Privacy Policy      |      Home    
Copyright © 2004. The Galef Institute. All rights reserved.
This Web site was partially developed through the generous support of the Institute of Education Sciences at the U.S. Department of Education.